Why The Law Forbids The Medicinal Use Of Natural Substances

Why The Law Forbids The Medicinal Use Of Natural Substances | medicine | FDA Government Government Control Medical & Health Natural Medicine Sleuth Journal

According to the FDA’s legal definition, a drug is anything that “diagnoses, cures, mitigates, treats, or prevents a disease.”

The problem with this definition is that there are numerous substances, as readily available and benign as found on our spice racks, which have been proven by countless millennia of human experience to mitigate, prevent and in some cases cure disease, and which cannot be called drugs according to the FDA.

How can this be? Well, the FDA has assumed for itself Godlike power, requiring that its official approval be obtained before any substance can legally be used in the prevention and treatment of disease.

The FDA’s legal-regulatory control therefore is totalitarian and Napoleonic in construct; what it does not explicitly permit as a medicine is implicitly forbidden.

Historically the FDA has required new drugs undergo expensive and elaborate multi-phased clinical trials, which are out of the grasp of any ordinary interest who might want to demonstrate the efficacy of a non-patentable (and therefore unprofitable) herb, food or spice.

The average out-of-pocket cost for obtaining a new drug approval is US$ 802 million dollars,[1] and therefore an investor putting capital into bringing to market a substance that does not lend itself to market exclusivity and therefore cannot produce a return on investment, is committing economic suicide, if not also breaking the law. The investor actually has a legally-binding fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders to make a profit. And therefore, capital will not flow into any would-be commodity that can be produced or obtained with ease, including most things that grow freely on this Earth.

It is an interesting footnote in history that shortly after the Declaration of Independence, Congress declared that natural substances, e.g. water or salt, were God’s gift to mankind and that therefore products of nature should be limited in their patent protection. While this was a noble declaration, it has actually been used against those whose rights it would protect. It has forced private interests to synthetically alter natural substances — for instance the burgeoning biotech field of recombinant DNA technology, i.e. genetically modified organisms (GMOs) — for the sole reason that it guarantees them ownership/patent rights.

In fact, a medical system that legally requires it make a profit threatens to destroy and/or incriminate itself if non-patented, non-profitable natural substances or therapies are employed. It also results in so much collateral damage to those it purports to serve that it could rightly be called a modern form of human sacrifice.

As a result, instead of choosing prospective medicines logically: because they work, are easily accessible, and safe, billions of dollars flow in the exact opposite direction, capitalizing only those substances which are unnatural, and therefore while proprietary are almost invariably unsafe, and whose access and administration can be intensively controlled.

Has The Attempt To Co-opt Medicine Through the Drug-Based Model Undone Itself? 

And yet, there is a silver lining to the story. Due to the fact that our bodies are ultimately constructed from the natural things (food, air and water), and obey very strict natural laws such as the well-known principle of chirality (handedness) – the fact that all amino acids in our body turn a beam of polarized light in the left-handed direction (L-lysine) and sugars to the right-handed direction (D-ribose)– one cannot simply create biologically active, synthetic drugs arbitrarily, as a mistake in handedness (or similar property) could be fatal. Nature, therefore, still provides an elegant biomolecular architecture of irreproducible intelligence and complexity, from which synthetic analogs are modeled and/or derivatives are spun.

As a result, billions of dollars of drug industry and government money (i.e. tax payer money) flow into finding lead compounds for drug development.  Nature is put on the rack, if you will, and her secrets teased from her through innumerable animal and test tube experiments, in order to find compounds that can then be converted into synthetic, patented drugs.

Inadvertently, some of the very same companies and interests which require that natural substances not receive the same drug-approval status as synthetic ones, are funding research that prove basic vitamins, foods and spices are as effective or more effective – and usually much safer – than the drugs  they are developing to replace or supplant them.

This means that tens of thousands of studies do exist showing that natural substances may prevent and/or treat disease, at least in the in vitro (test tube) and animal models. These results often confirm traditional uses in Ayurvedic, Chinese and other traditional systems of medicine, and therefore may be compelling enough for individuals or healthcare practitioners to use the information to inform their treatment decisions.

Why The Law Forbids The Medicinal Use Of Natural Substances | tumeric-fda-460x240 | FDA Government Government Control Medical & Health Natural Medicine Sleuth Journal

The Case For Curcumin In the Prevention and Treatment of Disease

The government biomedical and life sciences database known as Medline contains over 21 million published study citations, and is accessible to search through engines such as Pubmed.gov.  2.6 million of them contain reference to cancer.  115,000 of them remain after applying the “Complementary Medicine” filter.   There are 2,625 topics on cancer which can be found indexed on the GreenMedInfo.com database, referencing 612 natural substances of potential value.

Turmeric, and particularly its polyphenolic constituent known as curcumin, which gives the spice its golden hue, is one of the most extensively studied natural compounds of all time, with 4588 references to it on the National Library of Medicine’s bibliographic database known as Medline [as of 2.25.2012]. And yet, despite having been shown to have therapeutic value in over 500 disease states in animal and in vitro studies, it still has not been the subject of extensive human clinical research – for the reasons stated above.

GreenMedInfo.com, an open source natural medicine database, has indexed curcumin’s anti-cancer properties in over 50 cancers, with the top 10 most cancers researched in association with curcumin listed below.

Cancer Number of Articles
Breast Cancer 58
Colorectal Cancer 23
Colon Cancer 51
Prostate Cancer 42
Pancreatic Cancer 24
Cancers: Drug Resistant 40
Lung Cancer 37
Liver Cancer 27
Cancer Metastasis 32
Skin Cancer 15

Sources: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/substance/curcumin

As one can see curcumin holds great promise. It has been repeatedly demonstrated to possess simultaneously both chemoprotective/chemosensitizing and radioprotective/radiosensitizing properties, meaning it is capable of reducing the adverse effects on healthy cells caused by chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as well as enhance the cancer-killing properties of these conventional therapies. It also has an exceptionally high margin of safety, at least an order of magnitude greater than commonly used conventional chemotherapy agents such as 5-fluoruracil.[2] Given these facts curcumin, at the very least, should be considered an ideal candidate for use as an adjuvant in integrative cancer care, and perhaps as a first-line treatment alternative to conventional chemo-agents.

For additional information on the remarkable research supporting the use of Turmeric and Curcumin in medicine, watch the video below.  Join our Facebook research page on Turmeric for updates: Turmeric — What The Research Reveals

[1] http://www.cptech.org/ip/health/econ/dimasi2003.pdf

[2] Curcumin’s LD50 (lethal dose, 50%) in mice is at least 2,000 mg/kg, versus 5-fluorouracil 115 mg/kg,

© May 23, 2017 GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here http://www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter.

Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!



The post Why The Law Forbids The Medicinal Use Of Natural Substances appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Comply Or Lose Your Job- HR 1313 Would Force Vaccinations and DNA Submission (VIDEO)

Comply Or Lose Your Job- HR 1313 Would Force Vaccinations and DNA Submission (VIDEO) | comply-vaccinations | Civil Rights General Health Government Government Control Losing Rights Medical & Health Multimedia Sleuth Journal Special Interests Vaccines

A new bill, HR 1313, has been introduced by North Carolina Congresswoman Virginia Foxx which is designed to give employers absolute power over the employee by mandating whatever they deem to be proper “heath prevention” measures. These measures would include submitting DNA records as well as mandatory vaccinations and other perceived “health preventive” measures designed for the “greater good” of the general public. The result of not complying with this new law of course would be losing your job.

This kind of legislation thus gives large corporations government-like political status and god-like powers over the individual and further widens the gap between the rich and poor. But even more importantly this kind of legislation strips away intimate individual medical privacy and further solidifies the global control grid being created by the ruling elite as they attempt to complete their new world order plans of permanent human enslavement. No need to imagine how this “future” new world order enslavement will look like anymore. We’re seeing it all being rolled out in real-time and in broad daylight for the world to see.

As I discuss in my video below, all of this is part of the Communist-Globalist “peaceful revolution” strategy which is designed to financially neutralize the individual by first making the individual financially dependent on the state or the rulers, and then the threat of having all their food and survival (work related) income taken away is enough to “peacefully” silence the individual into submission.

Writer Dena Schmidt at NaturalHealth365.com writes regarding this latest bill:

While Republican congresswoman Virginia Foxx is the main sponsor of H.R. 1313, she is not the originator of the legislation. It is actually part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare.

Obamacare already threatens to assess penalties, surcharges and higher health insurance premiums to businesses and workers who refuse vaccinations – which the healthcare legislation refers to as “disease prevention.”


It’s time to pay attention and fight back. Organize your counterattack smartly, effectively and efficiently. Start somewhere and then build from there knowing that every voice counts. Below Schmidt explains some of the politics behind this resolution and offers a way to take action:

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) calls the H.R. 1313 bill a threat to both businesses and the people employed by them. Instead of allowing for free choice in health and wellness decisions, the legislation would attempt to implement a “carrot and stick” method for “strongly compelling” businesses and workers to accept the agendas of big pharma and its paid-off government officials.

The National Vaccine Information Center is urging concerned citizens to contact their own representatives and senators to express their views about H.R. 1313. When doing so, please remember to express your opinions intelligently and respectfully – you are far more likely to be heard if you are firm but polite when explaining your point of view.

All of this serves to remind us that science has been undermined by the ruling elite and that government pseudoscience has taken its place. This politicized science is then used to make claims which are then used to take away your rights. So first let’s be mindful of how this problem began and then let’s fight back with awareness, information-spreading and do what we can to introduce our own new bills to secure our right to privacy and health. Let’s remind both governments and large corporations that our right to natural health and personal physical and mental well being is inalienable and cannot be taken away.

Related video

Additional links below:

Contact Congresswoman Virginia Foxx here

Contact your local representatives here

Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!

The post Comply Or Lose Your Job- HR 1313 Would Force Vaccinations and DNA Submission (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Technology Is The Master Of Modern Slavery

Technology Is The Master Of Modern Slavery | techno-slaves | Government Control Science & Technology Sleuth Journal Society Special Interests

By: Tom Chatham, Project Chesapeake |

The recent cyber attack on computers worldwide is just the latest wakeup call to the future we are blindly building for ourselves. The vast majority of humanity embraces technology like it is their next breath of air. Without it, they feel like they will die.

Technology is a double edged sword that we wield that must be handled with care less we cut off one of our own limbs. Technology allows us to be more productive and work faster than without it but as we embrace more technology to relieve us of many manual tasks we must not let it rule our very existence.

Technology must be used as a lever, not a crutch. When we give up our ability to function in daily life and allow technology to rule our every move, we ultimately give up our freedom. To allow technology to dictate what we can do and when we can do it is to reduce ourselves to nothing more than compliant slaves to it.

When a hospital cannot perform operations or even see patients because their computers are down or we cannot communicate or travel because of computer hacking, we have allowed technology to become a crutch that prevents us from falling on our faces in its absence. When we cannot buy food or fuel or depend on electrical power for basic needs we have become too dependent on the technology we invented to assist us.

The use of technology is a good thing that allows us to move forward and build things we never dreamed of before but when it becomes a weakness, we need to reexamine our use of it. If we become so dependent on technology that we cannot function without it we are preparing ourselves for a doomsday scenario when it eventually fails and we are helpless to care for ourselves.

It is only logical to have backup systems to utilize in the event our technology fails for some reason. This is the whole reason we have people to warn us before hand such as the EMP Commission to tell us we are in danger if certain events happen. Technology provides us with many good things but it also leaves us susceptible to many bad things as well if we ignore our responsibility to use it wisely and not become too dependant on it.

Many people today can actually have withdrawal symptoms if they lose access to their technology for any length of time. This should be an alarm to society but most just brush it off as fear mongering. When the loss of technology causes a business to completely stop operations, that should be an indication they do not have sufficient backup systems to fall back on.

One of the prime tenants of the prepper movement is that they have multiple backup systems to rely on if technology stops working. This is just a logical step taken by people that have taken the time to analyze the threats posed by the loss our technology and determine action is warranted for the preservation of life following certain events. The less technology you require to take care of daily activities, the more freedom you have to live a normal life.

Most people still do not take the threat of technological disruptions to society seriously. They think that if something happens, someone will fix it and life will go on as normal. What they refuse to contemplate is if something happens and nobody can fix it. As society moves along this technological road they become more dependent on it and the risk to their lives increases as they lose the ability to do basic tasks. Hopefully this latest cyber attack will instill in people the need to have backup systems in place to continue their daily activities and live life as a free person and not be a slave to the technology they so eagerly seek.

Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!

The post Technology Is The Master Of Modern Slavery appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

4 Signs We Do Not Live in a Free Country

4 Signs We Do Not Live in a Free Country | crying-liberty | Civil Rights Government Government Control Sleuth Journal Society Special Interests

By: Gary ‘Z’ McGee, Waking Times |

“A man without a government is like a fish without a bicycle.” ~Alvaro Koplovich

Just as a fish does not need a bike, a man does not need a government. Especially not an oppressive one. As it stands, our government is cruel and arbitrary; certainly not free. Ironically, in a form of double speak amidst a flare of smoke and mirrors, statist propaganda has us believing that we live in a free country. When it’s more accurate to say that the government uses the term “freedom” as a distraction to keep people docile and under control. Let the sheep believe they are free and they won’t fight to become free. Meanwhile, covertly fence them in with outdated laws and an oppressive militarized police state, while convincing them it’s all in place for their own “protection.” Easy: Then it just takes care of itself. The conditioning and brain-washing kicks in with just a little boost from cognitive dissonance and soft slavery enslaves itself – statists gonna state. Let’s break it down.

1. We live in an oligarchic plutocracy disguised as a democratic republic.

“We may have democracy or we may have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” ~Louis Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice

In our country, money is power. Money concentrated in the hands of a few means power concentrated in the hands of a few, and since power tends to corrupt if it goes unchecked, the people must be free to check it, lest tyranny prevails. But because of reason number two in this article, the people are not free to check it; and here we are, slipping into tyranny.

If we lived within a horizontal democracy, we would be free. No masters, no rulers, and hence, no chance for power to become concentrated in the hands of a few. Easier said than done, sure, but nothing worth doing was ever easy. As it stands, it is impossible to live freely within an oligarchic plutocracy. the plutocrats will simply buy up power by creating oppressive laws and “legal” extortion rackets that keep the people without wealth and power in a permanent state of being poor and powerless. Add to that the use of lobbyists and a fiat currency based on debt, and you have a nation of hoodwinked debt slaves under the delusion that they live in a free democratic republic.

2. We have an overreaching militarized police force.

“All things are subject to interpretation; whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.” ~Nietzsche

I’ve written this one into the ground, but it bears repeating. this particular dead horse needs to be beaten, over and over, until enough people become aware of it for a tipping point to occur. Most of all, police need to become aware of it and make amends for the error of their ways. It begins with changing their minds.

We live in a police state. Bottom line. When the police force is offense-minded, overreaching, and militarized, there is no doubt about it. People are not free if they cannot drive from point A to point B without being harangued and harassed, by threat of violence and force, from an offense-minded cop pushing an immoral extortion racket based on the breaking of a petty law. And all to meet a quota. Sick! And don’t delude yourself for a second that ruining people’s lives over petty speeding tickets or failure to stops is anything close to justice – that’s just your statist brainwashing blinding you from the truth.

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg of the offense-minded police force’s gross overreach of power. They are judge, jury, and executioner in the street way too often these days for any free human’s comfort. Cops have way more power than any single human should have, and no single human should ever have that much power. At least not in a free country.

3. Taxation is not voluntary.

“When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change.” ~Dwayne Dyer

When taxation is forced, one cannot say they live in a free country. Taxation is not optional in this country, therefore this country is not free. Bottom line. If one decides not to pay their taxes, they are threatened with violence and/or prison if they don’t pay. That is point-blank extortion. And since it is being done by an authoritarian government, it is naked tyranny.

If one feels like paying taxes, then by all means, pay. That’s fair, because that’s voluntary. But if the state is using its monopoly on violence to get money out of you, that is not fair, because that is extortion. It really is that simple. If freedom is primary then voluntarism is paramount.

4. We have an oppressive bipartisan voting system that simply does not work.

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.” ~Noam Chomsky

When the voting system fails, then democracy fails. Or, in our case, the illusion of democracy fails. A voting system must be democratic, and it must be horizontally democratic, if it is going to be effective at preventing entrenched power from corrupting. When it cannot prevent power from becoming entrenched, then it does not work for the freedom of the people, it works toward the control of people. And here we are.

As it stands, we have a “voting” system that works well from bipartisanship, but does not work well for free human beings. The Republican/Democratic debacle we’re all forced into voting for is a tragic failure of monumental proportions. The power of republicans is too entrenched. The power of democrats is too entrenched. They both monopolize votes to the extent that voting other than this bipartisan fiasco is a wasted vote. And a wasted vote does not bode well for a free democracy. Add to that the influence of big money (plutocracy rearing its ugly head yet again), then you have a voting system set to control rather than progress the freedom of the people.

At the end of the day, it comes down to individuals being free to live, love, and prosper without a group of others forcing their values (rules and laws) on them through threat of violence. No masters, no rulers. As Epictetus said, “No man is free, who is not master of himself.”

Gary ‘Z’ McGeea former Navy Intelligence Specialist turned philosopher, is the author of Birthday Suit of God and The Looking Glass Man. His works are inspired by the great philosophers of the ages and his wide awake view of the modern world.

This article (4 Signs We Do Not Live in a Free Country) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is printed here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Gary ‘Z’ McGee and WakingTimes.com.

The post 4 Signs We Do Not Live in a Free Country appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Preach Politics from the Pulpit

Preach Politics from the Pulpit | Church_Silhouette | Faith Government Control Politics Sleuth Journal US Constitution & Bill Of Rights

“People have an idea that the preacher is an actor on a stage and they are the critics, blaming or praising him. What they don’t know is that they are the actors on the stage; he (the preacher) is merely the prompter standing in the wings, reminding them of their lost lines.”
― Søren Kierkegaard

When is a law unconstitutional and defaces the First Amendment?  Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; is as clear cut as any assertion in the basic law of the land. Yet Donald Trump correct — Lyndon Johnson passed legislation limiting political activity of churches and has lead to the systematic exclusion of religious political speech. Yet the Johnson amendment survived court challenges in 1983, 1990 and 2000, according to Pew. Such perversion of fundamental rights endowed by God and subverted by government illustrates that the nature of politics defies the only legitimate authority, which any society can derive and claim its moral authority upon.

“An amendment, pushed by Lyndon Johnson many years ago, threatens religious institutions with a loss of their tax-exempt status if they openly advocate their political views. Their voice has been taken away,” Trump said. “I am going to work very hard to repeal that language and to protect free speech for all Americans.

The threat of losing tax-exempt status persists as long as the law is in place, and politically-minded religious groups, particularly evangelicals, have regarded it as a suppression of free speech and an entanglement of the IRS in the operation of their religion.”

Contrast this punitive assault on religion with our historic tradition and understand How the Johnson Amendment Threatens Churches’ Freedoms.

“Our nation once had a longstanding tradition of church involvement in the political activity of the day. It was previously commonplace for pastors to preach about political issues and candidates.

[F]or the first century and a half of our nation’s history, ‘election sermons’ were commonplace in which pastors appealed to their congregations to support or oppose particular candidates based on their positions on issues.  Religious leaders did not merely speak about moral principles alone – they encouraged church members to take specific action in the voting booth to support those principles.”

With the prevailing anti-intellectualism culture which passes for secular humanism, the political establishment has become hell bent on isolating, marginalizing and restricting the pulpit from engaging in criticism of the government regime. Ploys that prohibit the phony partisan differences divert from the true intent behind the exclusion of God from the public square.

The notion that an artificial and penalizing force of intimidation and corruption like the IRS can displace the free exercise of religious speech out of a contrived and byzantine submission to ridicules restrictions, prove that tax exemption defined by an ungodly administrative system is pure absurdity.

Note that the American Bar Association contends in Nonprofits and Lobbying.

“When many people think about nonprofits and lobbying, they might think of a relationship like oil and water: they don’t mix. There is a widespread perception that nonprofits cannot lobby, or if they do lobby, they are exploiting some kind of legal loophole. The fact is that nonprofits, even 501(c)(3) organizations, which are the most restricted type of nonprofits, may legally lobby. Getting involved in the legislative process and having a say in policy discussions is not just an appropriate role for nonprofits; it is vital. If nonprofits are not speaking on behalf of their often-vulnerable communities, chances are nobody else is either.”

Compare this legal viewpoint with the religious deniers from the Freedom from Religion Foundation, who want you to believe a distorted restraint, When Church Lobbying Becomes Political Campaign Intervention.

“IRS regulations allow 501(c)(3)s to engage in issue advocacy or lobbying so long as it does not function as political campaign intervention. At times, however, the advocacy/lobbying can cross a line to become an indirect way to support or oppose a candidate for public office. “Even if a statement does not expressly tell an audience to vote for or against a specific candidate, an organization delivering the statement is at risk of violating the political campaign intervention prohibition if there is any message favoring or opposing a candidate.” Rev. Rul. 2007-41, 2007-25 I.R.B. (June 28, 2007). The IRS will consider all facts and circumstances to determine whether the advocacy is political campaign intervention. Id. Key factors include:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office;
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval for one or more candidates’ positions and/or actions;
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election;
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed in the communication has been raised as an issue distinguishing candidates for a given office;
  • Whether the communication is part of an ongoing series of communications by the organization on the same issue that are made independent of the timing of any elections; and
  • Whether the timing of the communication and identification of the candidate are related to a non-electoral event such as a scheduled vote on specific legislation by an officeholder who also happens to be a candidate for public office.” Id.”

Can anyone cite a more “politically incorrect” heresy of religious hate than these purveyors that deal in prohibiting constitutionally guaranteed free speech?

David Fiorazo makes a very valid point and cites a classic example to argue the crucial need for pastors to speak out with the bold courage of faith.

“Our hope is for Christian leaders to do what Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Confessing Church in Germany chose to do; put the Word of God above all things. We must not have any gods besides the one true God. Real faith cannot be silenced by government orders.

If we do nothing and the majority remains silent, the secular progressives win. Then, with God removed from all aspects of American society, they will be the ones to rule, deciding what is right and wrong, true and false, moral and immoral.

As the great Reverend Charles Finney once said,

“God will bless or curse America depending on the course Christians take in politics; they must vote for honest men and take consistent ground.”

Unrestricted political speech from congregations of worship is an inherent function of any multitude of parishioners. Begging for a tax exempt indulgence is like trading faithfulness to the gospels for a place of temporary relief in a fraudulent satanic debt credit financial system.

Government has become the harbinger and embodiment of evil. Most preachers are politically naive or outright deceived about the predatory policies that are promoted on virtually all levels of jurisdictions. Indeed, those who are aware, often lack the courage to speak out and risk the wrath of government retaliation. Sadly, many suffer from a loss of conviction in their own religious beliefs.

The historic origins from the likes of Cotton Mather, Reinhold Niebuhr, Francis Schaeffer to John Howard Yoder did not shy away from preaching on the politics of their day. More well known media and politically active evangelist such as Jerry Falwell, Billy Graham and Pat Robertson have been no stranger to preaching truth to power. However, none of these messages has translated into a compelling national revival of Christian faith that would turn the tide on the moral decline and ruin of our culture and society.

Don’t blame the efforts of the truly committed clergy, the sinner population is multiplying quicker than the dead corpses from the abortion slaughter. The Talmud stranglehold on levers of political power and media fake news issues out a steady stream of anti New Testament bias that denigrates traditional Christian teachings. The introduction of Sharīʿah Law practices to the body politik adds adverse intolerance to the popular abhorrence of time-honored gospel precepts.

While both heretical doctrines lay claim to the same free speech protection as believers in Christ churches, the present war on Christianity has a long lineage of intentional intensity to destroy the moral foundation of American fellowship.

Politics is embedded in every aspect of secular society. Religious assemblages are not second class citizens and possess the distinct right to preach politics in every aspect of their faith.

A nation that abandons their spiritual compass, results in a snake pit of ethical relativism because it denies the basic purpose for one’s existence. Any government  that denies churches the practice of political discourse is an Orwellian dictate that is incapable of repentance.

The absence of moral principles is the primary cause for the decline of our crumbling civilization. Temporal laws, regulations and amendments are not founded on legitimate authority. The LBJ sacrilege is systematic of a moral decay and systemic of a failed culture that has turned its back on God.

Even more tragic is when a false prophet, who is an apostate sits in the seat of Peter, and gains acceptance of his anti-Christian liberation theology. Americans need to combat this distortion of the gospels by waging a vigorous dialogue that challenges any attempt to silence unrestricted advocacy of political arguments from the current rostrum of religious shadows.

Without the bravery of martyred  believers, today’s spineless cowards will capitulate to the hater’s decrees of redemption and salvation.

Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!

The post Preach Politics from the Pulpit appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Here’s a 3-Part Blueprint For the Planned Domination Of Humanity With Viable Solutions

Here's a 3-Part Blueprint For the Planned Domination Of Humanity With Viable Solutions | blueprint-3part | Faith Globalism Government Control New World Order Sleuth Journal Society World News

The ruling elite want to dominate humanity forever. Using the tools at their disposal they’ve created a long sought out plan to achieve what they hope to be endless unchallenged power over the rest of the human species on earth. At this point in human history the goal which the ruling elite have for power and control is no secret. Why? Because the very same technology they are using to enslave us is also a great tool to use to expose their agenda and who they are.

What I described above is the usual “problem”. We in alternative media are experts at exposing the problems we have. But how about solutions? Before we get into solutions let’s dig deeper and demonstrate how at a larger scale the 3 major monotheistic religions that dominate this world all pose a threat to the globalist new world order plans, and subsequently these 3 groups have been set up to be attacked in a sophisticated well organized manner so as to not only divide humanity permanently but to suppress the voices of all those who have beliefs that threaten the finalization of the ruling elite’s global order.

For simplicity let’s list the globalist action plan here.

Task: Dominate humanity in the 21st century and beyond

Strategy: Divide humanity first into helpless segments devoid of values and beliefs and then condition them to permanently accept their enslavement.

Some implementation strategies:

1 Destruction of cultural values through various forms of education and social engineering.

2- Destruction of all longstanding conservative values, religious beliefs and tenets and implementation of moral relativity.

3- Destruction of all nation states that oppose the new world order plans and its banking systems.

4- Destruction of all forms of privacy and free speech to facilitate a global control grid.

5- Financially destroy the middle class and create a society that is financially government-dependent.

This list could be a lot longer like the planned poisoning of humanity in various ways (chemtrails, vaccines, GMOs etc) to achieve depopulation and much more. Above I’ve highlighted in bold items #1 and #2 because this is what I want to talk about today. Let’s talk about how the ruling elite have implemented 3 key strategies to persecute, divide and ultimately destroy the 3 major religions that pose the biggest threat to the secular new global order. Oddly, this is a topic rarely talked about even though the notion of religions versus politics has been a source of war, persecution, death and destruction since the beginning of time.

The way to divide the 3 major religions that pose the greatest threat to the new world order and which all come with traditions and deep rooted cultural values is to fund and facilitate a separate movement to go after each one individually. In the end all three of these major religions are ultimately demonized and the plan to eventually neutralize and or remove these religions out of the way is set in slow motion.

As you read on you will notice many of the steps to go after these 3 major religions are already well underway. All three of these religions already have a long history of persecution so none of them are new to this. The goal here is to show everyone the big picture as to how the ruling elite have created this triad of persecution so that they (the secular ruling elite) can have their global order without having to deal with the usual opposition that might come from those with strong religious conviction. We all know how badly religions have fared throughout history when they posed a threat to the ruling establishment at the time, whether the rulers were other competing religions or not.

#1 Planned Destruction Of Islam

So let’s begin with religion number one, Islam. Islam like any religion has their beliefs, in this case taken from the Koran. Obviously how someone interprets Islamic teachings may differ, but most Muslims around the world do not believe in or practice violence and oppression of others. Most will tell you this is based on misinterpretation of the Koran and radical fanaticism as we have seen in many religions throughout history.

Today however, we are all familiar with the Islamic faith and how it is perceived by those in power today here in the United States. Think “Bin Laden” and “al Qaeda” and need I say any more? Since at least the late 70’s the globalists were working on the “Islamic terrorism” narrative. Many point to Operation Gladio B as a signature operation starting around that time leading to today’s entire “terrorism” narrative which blames Islam for senseless violence. This narrative would ultimately prove to be the perfect weapon against all Muslims worldwide. It’s no wonder that practically all Muslim so called terrorism traces back to the US (think Zbigniew Brzezinski ) who created the idea in the first place arming and then training fighters with the help of then CIA operative Bin Laden or should I say “Tim Osmond” in what would later be referred to as “al Qaeda” fighters in Afghanistan in the late 70’s and beyond.

What was the end result of all of this co-opting of the Muslim religion to foster division hatred, then arming and radicalizing them? A priceless enemy that can be easily demonized before the world and used to create endless enemies and thus endless wars. (Think 9/11, al Qaeda, ISIS, endless war on terror, etc). That is more than enough reason to destroy the Islamic faith and baptize it in the blood of terrorism. Islam will never recover from this Gladio B invasion that the likes of Brezinski conjured up in the 70’s and today it is not unusual to here an American particularly a conservative Christian or Republican say or believe that all Muslims are suspected terrorist. The Islam brand is politically tarnished in perfect alignment with the new world order plans.

#2 Planned Destruction Of Christianity

Christianity on the other hand has been under attack by the Left wing Liberal “progressives” for some time. As it is with almost all Left wing Liberal issues at the root of this agenda is the Communist (now better known as the globalist) agenda to undermine Christianity, conservative and family values and ultimately things like the Constitution and rule of law here in America.

Substituted in place of Christian values is Cultural Marxism, moral relativity and subjectivism, lawlessness and new “politically correct” rules that allows these “social justice warriors” to redefine what natural law is all about, what is right and what is wrong and thus what a crime is, what is considered “harassment” and what is an act of violence. This process of redefining terms is just the tip of the iceberg for the Liberal Left who are now spearheading the new world order agenda as I’ve discussed many times in the past. This is the reason why today Christians and conservatives are accused of “hating” gays and lesbians instead of acknowledging that condemnation of the LGBT lifestyle is embedded in most cultures and particularly Christianity which is based on Bible scriptures.

This is also why Obama, the ultimate deceiver and hater of Christian values, went out of his way to use the US Educational system as a brainwashing tool for the children over the past 8 years unnecessarily exposing innocent children to bizarre sexual topics and other topics that undermine family traditional values.

But of course it doesn’t end there. We witnessed over the past 8 years of Obama how anyone with conservative values who believes in the Constitution, freedom and especially the 2nd Amendment was persecuted, spied on and with every chance the establishment got was even labeled as “domestic terrorists” (think Bundy Ranch Patriots). We can see clearly today that the conservative Constitution and freedom loving Patriot with Christian traditional values is a major threat to the new world order and the selected arch enemy of this group is the Liberal Left. This hatred and demonization of Conservatives is only intensifying and the worse is yet to come.

#3 Planned Destruction Of Judaism

Finally there is Judaism. Now you may be asking, who is against Jews and who is against Judaism so much that it warrants mentioning in this article? And you may be wondering how and why is Judaism a threat to the new world order? Actually this segment is probably the most important of the three because it’s the one that gets the least amount of attention and is the topic truth seekers, freedom lovers and alternative media followers have the least knowledge about and thus talks about the least. That’s because most people probably don’t understand what Judaism is about and what it means to be Jewish. Even more so, especially in the alternative media which is so dominated by disinformation trolls and Jew haters there is even less understanding what Zionism is about. We’ll get to Zionism shortly but first let’s examine a few important facts about Judaism, one of the oldest religions in the world.

Today there are about 14-15 million Jews worldwide depending on where you research this. And the breakdown of Jewish sects is about 38% Reform Judaism, 33% Conservative Judaism and 22% Orthodox Judaism to round out the top 3 sects. Together that’s over 83% of Jews worldwide that share some kind of values based on Judaism. The most liberal of these is the Reform Jews and even this sect “observe moral law” and “emphasize personal connection to Jewish tradition”. Meaning that most Jews observe strong traditions related to their culture and religion which are based on morality, commitment to the teachings of the Torah and or traditional Jewish law. Can you see how this can be a problem for the new world order?

But then there is Zionism. To explain the role of Zionism I came across a comment from Arthur Weiss who has lived in Israel. I thought his explanation of Zionism is very interesting and will allow us to move forward more easily. I’ve highlighted in bold the most meaningful sections. The question was posed:

What percentage of Jews living in Israel do not believe in Zionism? What about those living in the United States?

Before answering this question you have to answer two things:
1) What is Zionism
2) What does it mean to be a Jew

Zionism can have multiple definitions – from a belief that Israel is the Jewish National homeland, to the right of Jews to self-determine their own fate in their own country, to a wish for a theocracy under the leadership of the Messiah in the land of Israel. Most definitions work on the assumption that Jews are a separate nation – and that Judaism is more than a religion unlike Christianity. Thus, although a Jew may be born in England or America, they have both aspects i.e. they are an English Jew or an American Jew rather than an Englishman or American who practices Judaism as their religion.

Not all Jews are religious or practicing in their Judaism. Some were born Jewish but apart from that, don’t identify with anything Jewish at all. They may be anti-Zionist as a way of stressing that they want nothing to do with being Jewish – and as support for Israel is one of the last aspects of being Jewish that remains after all the ritualistic, religious aspects are discarded, this is one way to show how ‘non-Jewish’ they are. That is a reason why some left-wing secular Jews claim not to be Zionist. It’s a way of emphasizing their rejection of Judaism and their Jewish backgrounds.

Some Jews are extremely religious and view Zionism as a secular political movement and so define themselves as anti-Zionist. They reject the secular nature of Israel. At the same time, such Jews will pray every day – several times – for a return to the land of Israel, for the Jewish sovereignty in the land, and for the rebuilding of the Temple on the site of the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem. Groups such as Neturei Karta that are virulently anti-Zionist fall in this category. Such religious anti-Zionist Jews want Israel to be theocracy and believe that Israel should only exist as a sovereign nation when the Messiah comes. Some go a step further and say that the existence of Israel is preventing this – and so want Israel to be destroyed so that it can be recreated in the form they want under the leadership of the Messiah.

The point of this is that the VAST majority of Jews globally are Zionist in that they want a Jewish State in the land of Israel. Where they differ is in the nature of that State – secular or religious.

The majority of non-religious Jews also want a Jewish state in Israel or are against the idea of there not being one. They may see Zionism as active support for the government of Israel and so may reject Zionism, as defined by this. However they still support Israel’s existence as a Jewish state – even if they say they are non-Zionist because they don’t support Israel’s current government. (They will view a Zionist as somebody who is totally uncritical on Israel and its policies – and hence define themselves as non-Zionist, even though they support Israel and the Jewish rule there).

A small minority of non-religious Jews are genuinely anti-Zionist – as discussed – as a way of demonstrating their rejection of Judaism (or all religions).

Thus if you define Zionism as support for Israel and/or the wish for there to be Jewish sovereignty of Israel, then over 99% of Jews are Zionists.

If you define Zionism as support of the current government of Israel and all its decisions, then a much smaller percentage (but still, at a guess over 50%) are Zionist.

If you define Zionism as support for the “greater Israel” movement and in favor of settlements throughout Israel and including the territories occupied in 1967, plus limits on the rights of non-Jews (including Arabs), etc. then a VERY VERY small percentage of Jews both in Israel and outside Israel will support this. The problem is that too many people who do not understand the Jewish connection to Zionism see this as a definition of Zionism and then mention all the Jews they know who don’t support this – and then claim most Jews aren’t Zionist, and that you can be a practicing Jew without being Zionist.

I posted this comment to demonstrate that if this writer is correct then practically the entire alternative media including myself have for the most part been using the term “Zionism” in a different way that most Jews themselves use it. We already discussed the various major sects of Judaism but this issue of Zionism is a political issue which depending on how you define Zionism in your mind either most Jews or a very small percentage of them endorse.

Example, if Zionism is defined as Jews that want and feel they deserve a homeland then yes, most Jews are Zionist as this writer implies. But if we define it in the context of Oded Yinon’s paper “The greater Israel” calling for violent regional domination or in the context of the corrupt Israeli involvement in US crimes (think 9/11), the endless war on terror, NATO operations etc, then most Jews even the ones living in Israel are NOT Zionists. This semantics difference it turns out is just the tip of the iceberg.

We know Zionist criminals (think Mossad) have been terrorizing nations in their region for years perfectly in line with the Zionist Greater Israel plan. And just like the US Military Industrial Complex, the Bush Clinton Obama Neocons which are now taking over the Trump administration, the CIA and the deep state working with criminal elements in other nations, all of these elements together make up the global deep state. As a whole these elements want to create a global order and when it’s all said and done ALL religions ESPECIALLY those who are committed to traditional scriptures whether it be the Bible, the Koran or the Torah will be a threat to the new global order.

For this reason the ruling elite have devised a plan for each of these monotheistic religions. And by the way, monotheistic religions like Islam, Christianity and Judaism are a problem for the new world order because those who follow these religions won’t accept any other God. There is a reason why these 3 religions have suffered horrific persecution throughout history, but I digress.

The weapon devised against Judaism are at least two-fold. One is the undermining of traditional values just like the globalist did in their attack against Christianity and conservative values here in the US. Similarly, the secularization of Judaism has been one major way to attack Judaism and the Jews though most don’t realize this. In other words “secularization” was to Judaism what “radicalization” was to Islam. The Jews also have been bamboozled and bombarded with political propaganda dating back to the creation of the Israeli state following WW2. They too are dealing with a police state, fake news, government surveillance and everything we have going on in the US. Yet most who attack Jews fail to see this.

The other important war being waged against Judaism is the demonization of all Jews by what I call the “blame Israel” psyop movement that I have been exposing for years now. This movement is very real and it lives inside of the alternative media. We all see the relentless and endless trolling comments on every article and video posted on alternative media blaming the Jews for everything wrong in the world even in topics that have nothing to do with Israel. I’ve been warning truth seekers for years that I believe this is an organized intelligence movement and I have a lot of reasons to believe this.

The original goal of the “blame everything on Israel” movement which rose during the early years of the 9/11 truth movement was to take advantage of the known Israeli involvement in 9/11 and use it to put a huge symbolic swastika on the 9/11 Truth movement so that Jews around the world who would otherwise look into 9/11 Truth would instead not even look into 9/11 thinking it was just another anti-Semitic movement. I’m sure the strategy worked to some degree and the movement took off from there.

Today the movement serves as a perfect tool to not only attack someone for being Jewish by confusing criminal Zionism with being Jewish but it is also a perfect tool to use to defend Obama crimes, defend the Liberal Left agenda, push the blame of 9/11 away from Cheney, Rumsfeld, the US military, the FBI, the Bush Neocons and the rest of the criminals involved and instead divert the blame to Israel. The movement was also used last year to block awareness of the Wikileaks revelations about Hillary, Podesta, vault 7, the deep state coup d’etat and much more. The online trolls pushing the “blame Israel for everything” psyop were quick to say that Julian Assange and Wikileaks is really “Mossad” and even that Trump is “working for Israel”. Even when it was revealed in 2014 and 2015 that the Islamic State or ISIS had been created by the US and trained by the CIA in Jordan the “blame Israel” trolls were right there to tell us that ISIS really stands for ‘Israeli Secret Intelligence Service”. Remember that one? If it was just about blaming the political government of Israel like it is with all other nations that commit crimes it would be understandable and even justified. But for some reason it never ends there. Jews are almost always ultimately to blame for crimes committed by Israel.

The point is that all three of these religions and cultures (Islam, Christianity and Judaism) have been targeted for attack by the ruling elite and the attacks are not going away ever because the globalists never give up. So all we can do is make people aware of these existing larger agendas and paradigms at play as we speak.

Of the three groups Muslims face the most severe clear and present danger, the Christians are already feeling the heat after 8 years of Obama, the unleashing of ISIS terrorists against Christians and the rise of the cry bully children of the new world order making America an increasingly more dangerous world for Christians and Conservatives. Lastly Jews all around the world are being blamed for all the above in an underground online world that takes the actions of the criminal Zionist elements of the global deep state and blaming these actions on all Jews. The precondition for the persecution of all Jews is very much being laid down and that is because the globalist, I believe when the time is right, will eventually persecute all Jews especially those who hold on to the teachings of the Torah and traditional values, and like the Christians and the Muslims anyone who doesn’t bow to the state will be eliminated.

I believe the ruling elite know that the order of persecution is crucial to the success of their agenda. The Jews will be last, the Muslims are in the middle of their own holocaust and the Christians also are now realizing what is happening worldwide to them.

This my friends is how you divide humanity. You destroy all values by secularizing, radicalizing and demonizing the religions that pose a threat. You remove the long standing traditional values, faith-based beliefs and the spiritual and deep rooted elements that form the fabric of that culture and then you go after the rest of the people.


As I said at the beginning of this article, we in the alternative media are good at pointing out problems. Now we know the problem with regard to how the ruling elite are shutting down humanity and how the key monotheistic religions of the world are a major threat to their plan. So what solutions are there knowing what we know now?

1- Share knowledge about these religions– Increase your knowledge and history of Judaism, Islam and Christianity as well and understand the history of those who oppose them as already discussed. Become familiar with the various agendas to destroy these 3 major religions as well as the values and beliefs they hold. Consider all arguments and dig deep until you get to the truth. Remember, most people mean well and the criminal element on this planet is a minority not a majority. Realize that the ruling elite built their theories about humanity long ago based on Freudian-like theories which suggested that humans are inherently evil. Deceptive theories such as these which disregard a good loving and nurturing upbringing facilitate, education, faith and positivity call for big authoritarian government to control the “evil” people by necessity.

Ironically, now that Trump has signed an Executive Order preventing the IRS from punishing religious organizations for taking political stances hopefully more religious leaders will take an open and strong stance on what is right and what is wrong. Hopefully more religious leaders will also call out government corruption for what it is. Only time will tell.

2- Stop technocracy– Without stopping this mad push for technology I believe humanity is headed toward extinction. We are now on a suicide path to destruction if we don’t stop inventing and improving and allowing these robots and artificial intelligence to take over our lives. We must begin to realize that aside from a few conveniences robots do not enhance our lives they only make it easier for corporations to make more profits and allow government to spy on you.

In order to take action against runaway technology it must begin with you. I also believe that everyone must begin the change by taking a good look at their smart phone and making a commitment to getting rid of it. Reconstruct your new life around not having a smart phone. Even if you don’t do it today. Pick a day, maybe New Years Day. Whenever it is, I believe we will ALL have to come to this point. Once you do this then pick the next item. Make a conscious commitment to returning your life to some form of electronic normality.

3- Rediscover humanity– We must rediscover who we are as human beings. Humans were never meant to be wearing electronics, texting 24/7 or holding a phone to your head every day. We were not meant to have smart appliances running our lives. We are meant to socialize, to meet in person, to commune together. Let’s not give this up. Rediscover traditional values and stop listening to the Liberal Left lunatics who feel everything must change for the sake of change itself.

4- Protect your child’s education and health– Take care of your children yourself because they are the future. Protect your child’s mental and physical health. Don’t give them over to the Medical Industrial Complex or the Board of Education. Instead take control and nurture their health because this is your duty as a parent.

5- Commit to small government– Support small municipal or community actions and take actions at small levels with neighbors, family or friends. We must focus on taking back some level of government at the smallest possible level. Make a list of things in your personal life and share this with others. This is what I’m doing here in LA.

Try to rediscover and appreciate the concept of small government versus big government, small businesses versus big businesses and ask yourself what can you do to facilitate freedom and liberty. Do your part to bring back freedom and stop relying on a President to do it for you.

6- Support alternative media– I/we need your help. If you made it this far and you are still reading this article it’s because you care. Help me/us survive to continue sharing articles, videos and solutions. All of this takes time and effort. Support the websites that share this article because they too need help to continue doing what they are doing.

Hopefully the awareness and understanding that is being shared worldwide will trigger more and more individual action which will trigger other events and actions and eventually more good things will continue to develop. Remember that we are in a time continuum and usually nothing happens overnight and all victories and loses are temporary. We have already seen incredible revelations and developments over the past 6-12 months that blow our minds. Let’s keep taking it all in and continue sharing real news and most of all let’s not give up in our fight for freedom, liberty and Truth.

Related video

Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!


The post Here’s a 3-Part Blueprint For the Planned Domination Of Humanity With Viable Solutions appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

It Is Becoming Illegal To Be Homeless In America As Houston, Dallas And Dozens Of Other Cities Pass Draconian Laws

It Is Becoming Illegal To Be Homeless In America As Houston, Dallas And Dozens Of Other Cities Pass Draconian Laws | homelessness | Civil Rights Government Government Control Special Interests

Should we make homelessness against the law and simply throw all homeless people into prison so that we don’t have to deal with them?  Incredibly, this is actually starting to happen in dozens of major cities all across the United States.  It may be difficult to believe, but in many large urban areas today, if you are found guilty of “public camping” you can be taken directly to jail.  In some cities, activities such as “blocking a walkway” or creating any sort of “temporary structure for human habitation” are also considered to be serious crimes.  And there are some communities that have even made it illegal to feed the homeless without an official permit.  Unfortunately, as the U.S. economy continues to slow down the number of homeless people will continue to grow, and so this is a crisis that is only going to grow in size and scope.

Of course the goal of many of these laws is to get the homeless to go somewhere else.  But as these laws start to multiply all across the nation, pretty soon there won’t be too many places left where it is actually legal to be homeless.

One city that is being highly criticized for passing extremely draconian laws is Houston.  In that city it is actually illegal for the homeless to use any sort of material to shield themselves from the wind, the rain and the cold

Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner is taking a similar approach—his anti-encampment ordinance makes it illegal to use “fabric, metal, cardboard, or other materials as a tent or temporary structure for human habitation.” This ensures that the Houstonian homeless are vulnerable not just to the elements, but also to the constant threat of the police. Officials cite one of the most common justifications for crackdowns on the homeless: neighborhood safety (a more socially acceptable way of talking about the not-in-my-backyard mentality).

With all of the other problems that we are facing as a nation, it stuns me that there are politicians that would spend their time dreaming up such sick and twisted laws.

According to one news report, the homeless in Houston are now officially banned from doing all of the following things…

1. They can’t block a sidewalk, stand in a roadway median or block a building doorway. (AKA they can’t panhandle).

2. They also can’t do any of these things — blocking walkways — under state law that already existed.

3. They can’t sleep in tents, boxes or any other makeshift shelter on public property.

4. They also can’t have heating devices.

5. They can’t carry around belongings that take up space more than three feet long, three feet wide, three feet tall.

6. People can’t spontaneously feed more than five homeless people without a permit.

If I was a homeless person in Houston, I would definitely be looking to get out of there.

But where are they going to go?

Things are almost as bad in Dallas.  In fact, it is being reported that the police in Dallas “issued over 11,000 citations for sleeping in public from January 2012 to November 2015.”

When you break that number down, it comes to 323 citations per month.

Of course some people have tried to challenge these types of laws in court, but most of the challenges have been unsuccessful.  For example, just check out what recently happened in Denver

Three people who were contesting Denver’s urban-camping ban were found guilty on Wednesday, April 5, at the Lindsey-Flanigan courthouse. The defendants — Jerry Burton, Randy Russell and Terese Howard — were determined to have unlawfully camped on November 28, 2016, and to have interfered with police operations at one location. All three were sentenced with court-ordered probation for one year and between twenty and forty hours of community service.

The case challenged Denver’s unauthorized-camping ordinance, which has been divisive ever since Denver City Council approved it in 2012.

Since the courts are generally upholding these laws, this has just emboldened more communities to adopt anti-homelessness ordinances.  According to one report, dozens of major cities have now passed such laws…

City-wide bans on public camping (PDF) have increased by 69 percent throughout the United States. What used to be seen as an annoyance is now prohibited, forcing fines or jail time on those who certainly can’t afford it. The only nationwide nonprofit devoted to studying this, the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, has been tracking these changes since 2006. Their findings? There are a scary number of laws passed that ironically make it costly to be homeless.

For example, in 33 of the 100 U.S. cities they studied, it’s illegal to publicly camp. In 18, it’s illegal to sleep in public. Panhandling is illegal in 27 cities.

In 39 cities, it’s illegal to live in vehicles.

As I have warned repeatedly, we are seeing hearts grow cold all around us.  Instead of doing everything that they can to try to help those in need, communities are trying to make them go some place else, and those that try to feed and help the homeless are being harshly penalized.

Sadly, all of this comes at a time when homelessness is on the rise all over America.  In a previous article I pointed out that in New York City the number of homeless people recently hit a brand new all-time high, and things have gotten so bad in Los Angeles that the L.A. City Council has formally requested that Governor Jerry Brown declare a state of emergency.

We tend to think of the homeless as bearded old men with drinking problems, but the truth is that many of the homeless are children.

In fact, the number of homeless children in the United States has risen by about 60 percent since the end of the last recession.

If this is how we are going to treat some of the most vulnerable members of our society while things are still relatively stable, how are we going to be treating one another when the economy completely collapses?

Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!

The post It Is Becoming Illegal To Be Homeless In America As Houston, Dallas And Dozens Of Other Cities Pass Draconian Laws appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

The Deep State Transcends Sovereign Law – John Titus (VIDEO)

The Deep State Transcends Sovereign Law – John Titus (VIDEO) | deep-state | Civil Rights Government Government Control Government Corruption Multimedia Sleuth Journal Special Interests Tyranny & Police State

The ultimate form of political and economic power is the power to commit crimes with impunity.  – John Titus

The Shadow of Truth is pleased to present a preview of, “All The Plenary’s Men,” the new film by John Titus (Best Evidence videos / Bailout Films). The term “plenary” in this context is defined as, “complete in every respect;” as in, “plenary power,” meaning, “absolute power.”

In his spectacularly prophetic dystopian novel, “1984,” George Orwell offered the following observation about power:

Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.

The quiet revolution occurring behind the facade that is called “Washington, DC” for several decades has led to the complete hijacking of the U.S. Government by an entity nefariously known as, “The Deep State.” Those who warned about The Deep State previously were labelled conspiracy theorists. Now, with the help of Wikileaks, the idea of the Deep State is openly discussed even in the mainstream media. The Deep State is Orwell’s Big Brother.

The ultimate power is the power to commit crimes with impunity, meaning that the entity committing the crime does so free from fear of punishment. We saw this with the Iraq invasion in several respects. The invasion was never sanctioned by the UN Security Council or in accordance with the UN’s founding Charter. It was an illegal war waged by what has become the world’s most dangerous terrorist: The U.S. Deep State. Big oil is
part of the Deep State. Therefore, when Halliburton was caught charging the U.S. taxpayer $10/gallon for gasoline being sold to the military in Iraq, Halliburton was never punished.

The Deep State Transcends Sovereign Law – John Titus (VIDEO) | Untitled-3 | Civil Rights Government Government Control Government Corruption Multimedia Sleuth Journal Special Interests Tyranny & Police State
Even more horrifying was watching the Too Big To Fail banks break every major securities law in the rule book leading up to the financial collapse of 2008 and escape free from any form of prosecution. Not only were these banks allowed to trample all over the law, but the Government used $800 billion of taxpayer money to keep the banks from collapsing and to enable the banks to pay large bonuses that year.

The primary theme underlying John Titus,’ “All The Plenary’s Men,” is that any entity that can commit crimes with impunity has risen above a nation’s sovereign law. In fact, that entity IS the sovereign authority. Thus, The Deep State is the sovereign authority standing behind the U.S. Government. The Deep State is comprised of not just the NSA, CIA and Pentagon, but also Big Oil, Big Banks, Big Healthcare and Big Technology.

“We’ve been swirling down the toilet as a nation since 2007” (John Titus). The Shadow Truth chatted with John about his upcoming film, for which he provided a thoroughly engrossing, if not chilling, trailer:

Sharing is caring!

Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!

The post The Deep State Transcends Sovereign Law – John Titus (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Goodbye U.S.S.R And Hello U.S.S.A. (VIDEO)

Goodbye U.S.S.R And Hello U.S.S.A. (VIDEO) | surveillance | Civil Rights Government Government Control Losing Rights Multimedia National Security Agency Society Surveillance

“If You Have Nothing To Hide You Have Nothing to Fear”, said once Joseph Goebbels, former Nazi Minister of Propaganda. We all know what happened while the Nazis and their American collaborators were in power. Yet, the quote cited above is exactly what the handlers of the U.S.S.A. use to justify its existence.

The same quote was used by William Hague and pretty much every other law enforcement official who believes in the need to have a worldwide Surveillance State. Even lay people who are interviewed on the streets of America and Europe often repeat the words of the former Nazi Propaganda Minister.

However, since not everyone agrees with Goebbels, many politicians and bureaucrats need to create reason for them to believe. The best reasons to make people believe what would be otherwise un-believable, is the typical ‘little known outside threat’ and the premise is always the same: we all need to surrender something we hold dear in order to do away with the threat.

For instance, in spite of what many western politicians say about Russia and how its actions supposedly resemble the U.S.S.R., the fact is that Russia is not the USSR. It is not even close to it being the U.S.S.R..

Ad-hominem attacks on Russia and its leaders, of whom I am not a fan of, are attempts to distract people from a greater global threat: the U.S.S.A..

The U.S.S.A. has been in the works for decades and its power has been expanded based on false premises, such as the Russian menace, the ISIS threat or the Al-Qaeda rising tide of global terrorism.

The United Surveillance States of America (U.S.S.A.) and its branches in Europe, Asia and Oceania are the threat we have all been distracted from by way of unfounded fear, misinformation, propaganda and outright ignorance.

This entity is not only charged with spying on billions of people worldwide, but also with carrying out offensive cyber attacks on infrastructure at home and abroad.

It collects billions of bytes of metadata whose associated content is later used, when possible, as a tool to blackmail anyone who may become an obstacle to the advancement of the U.S.S.A..

The U.S.S.A. is not only composed by American and allied monitoring agencies, but also by global communication networks and media conglomerates that, either voluntarily or by way of force (inter-connectedness, built-in back doors, direct and indirect threats, etc) serve as bridges to the larger U.S.S.A. infrastructure to capture, filter and direct information on everything and everyone that is somehow making use of digital resources almost anywhere on the planet.

Although much of the blame on the existence and operation of the United Surveillance States of America has been rightfully placed on the United States National Security Agency (NSA), as its name describes it, the existence of such a massive surveillance infrastructure would not be possible without the collaboration of similar entities in Europe, Asia and Oceania, to cite a few.

It is true, America is the central command of the U.S.S.A., but this globally operating multi-headed cyber beast could not do the work it does without the collaboration of partner organizations in other parts of the world.

A documentary titled “America’s Surveillance State”, whose content is based on declassified and leaked documents as well as testimony from former ‘intelligence gatherers’ such as Thomas Drake, Russ Tice and Edward Snowden, unveiled details about the strength and reach of the U.S.S.A. and how, despite political rhetoric from seating presidents and congressmen about its despotic existence, it continues to grow out of control.

The following is the six part documentary which shows how the U.S.S.A and not the U.S.S.R. is the most significant threat to all of us. This is so not only because it is out there sniffing it all, but also because people have become accustomed to it. It is part of their lives and most of them do not even see it as an inconvenience, much less as a threat.

Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!


The post Goodbye U.S.S.R And Hello U.S.S.A. (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

The Illuminati Goal Of Abolishing Private Property: Reborn In Globalism

The Illuminati Goal Of Abolishing Private Property: Reborn In Globalism | feudal-society | Civil Rights Globalism Government Control Illuminati Losing Rights Sleuth Journal Special Interests US News

By: Jon Rappoport |

There is a direct line from Adam Weishaupt’s secret society, the Illuminati, which he formed in Bavaria in 1776, to Karl Marx, and onward to the modern Globalist agenda.

One of the key shared ideas: the abolition of private property.

Many people hold a negative view of Weishaupt, the Illuminati, and especially Marx, and so it fell to Globalists to couch their ideas about property in more acceptable terms.

That feat (one of many attempted) was expressed, in 1976, by Carla Hills, US Trade Representative and a key member of the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission. Hills is credited as the principal architect of the Globalist NAFTA Treaty, which has destructively affected the US and Mexican economies.

Patrick Wood, author of the classic, Technocracy Rising, unearthed Hills’ brief statement on private property. I’ve broken it up into three parts, so I can comment after each mind-bending point.

Carla Hills: “Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market.”

Her use of the term “human settlements” is curious, as is her reference to “crucial role it [land] plays.” Is she trying to take us back to an ancient period in human history, when people were first abandoning nomadic existence and turning to agriculture and fixed communities? It appears so. She wants us to think of land in terms of “oh, look, we can stop wandering and live here, and this space of soil will play ‘a crucial role’ in our future.” It’s been centuries since private ownership of land became a reality. But Hills doesn’t like acknowledging that. And through her use of “human settlements,” she also wants us to believe that the ancient concept of an entire community moving on to land to live is the only valid view. An individual staking a claim to land or buying it is verboten. It’s a corruption of the natural order. I assume Hills wasn’t living on a kibbutz or in a commune when she wrote her statement, but we’ll leave that problem for another time.

Hills asserts that private ownership of property isn’t ordinary and can’t be thought of that way. Individuals shouldn’t “control it.” And the free market causes problems. Well, of course, the free market causes problems, if you assume that no one should own more land than anyone else. And yes, private ownership, based on hard work, is inefficient, if that means some super-government can’t take land away “for the public good.”

Hills stops short of saying government should own all land, but that’s where she’s going.

She continues: “Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes.”

Social injustice, that familiar theme. Some people might own more land than others. That’s not right. That’s unjust. There should be no reward for hard work and intelligence. No. Instead, there is only planning from above. The wise demi-golds, who have our best interests at heart, can decide all the uses to which land is put. They can own huge tracts of land themselves, because they are gods. But the rest of us must submit to the development schemes they lay out. Only bitter clingers, who actually work for a living and strive and make their own way in the world, believe in private property. They’re for social injustice. They don’t want to give way to Greater Sharing.

Finally, Hills states: “Social justice, urban renewal and development, the provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole.”

Kinder and gentler vision. Just launch a plan to give EVERYONE a decent dwelling and healthy conditions. That’s how land should be used and thought of. No more private property. EVERYONE, of course, includes people (in unlimited numbers—no ceiling) who come here from anywhere in the world. And they come because here they get justice. They should get free housing. They should get “healthy conditions.” No problem. Everyone gets a 20-foot by 20-foot square box to live in.

What could go wrong?

Carla Hills is couching her statement to avoid the heavy philosophy and militant threat and totalitarian thrust of the Illuminati and Marx, but she’s on the same page. She’s “sustainable” and “green” and “kind” and “thoughtful” and “caring.” She’s perfect for self-styled liberals and the virtue-signaling Clueless.

She’s part of the tradition that wants to take down the individual spirit and stuff it in the collective.

I know many people (and I’m sure you do, too) who have worked hard, bought land, built a home, raised children, who would nevertheless applaud Carla Hills’ statement. They’ve succeeded in compartmentalizing their minds. It never occurs to them that if the Globalist dream came true, they would wake up one day with their homes and property ripped out from under them. If they think about it at all, they think they can have it both ways. They can continue to live as they’ve been living, but somehow, at the same time, social justice will be served.

They’re in a dream. It’s so pretty.

There is no iron hand, no Lenin, no Marx, no Stalin. All 400 million or so people in the US have lovely little free cottages nestled in valleys, and it’s spring, and the trees are flowering.

Down a country road, in his wheelchair, comes arch-Globalist George Soros, cackling and humming and talking on the phone to his broker. He’s flanked by bodyguards. Perched on nearby hills, snipers are in position, just in case a threat develops.

Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!

The post The Illuminati Goal Of Abolishing Private Property: Reborn In Globalism appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS