Bill Gates’ New Population Control Microchip Due for Launch in 2018

Bill Gates' New Population Control Microchip Due for Launch in 2018 | bill-gates-new-population-control-microchip-due-for-launch-2018-17717 | Bill Gates Eugenics & Depopulation Medical & Health Multimedia RFID Chips Science & Technology Sleuth Journal

Bill Gates is due to launch his new population control microchip in 2018
[image: Neon Nettle]

By: Jay Greenberg, Neon Nettle

 

Multi-billionaire Bill Gates has developed a new microchip, along with researchers at MIT, that will allow for adjustments to be made to a person’s hormone levels via remote control, in a bid to reduce the planet’s population.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been working in conjunction with a small Massachusetts startup to develop the “digital pill” that will enable women’s fertility to be switched on or off, remotely, with the touch of a button.

The new “digital version of the contraceptive” pill will be tested in Africa this year where the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has spent years developing vaccination and family planning programs.

Following testing, the microchips are due to be rolled out globally in 2018 with “every woman in America” replacing their regular contraceptive pill with the new remote-controlled chips, according to Gates.

According to the Guardian, the chip is implanted under the skin and releases small doses of the contraceptive hormone levonorgestrel on a daily basis, with enough capacity to last 16 years.

About the same size as a Scrabble tile, it houses a series of micro-reservoirs covered by an ultra-thin titanium and platinum seal.The hormone is released by passing a small electric current from an internal battery through the seal, which melts it temporarily, allowing a 30 microgram dose of levonorgestrel to seep out each day. And it can be simply switched off by a wireless remote, avoiding the clinical procedures needed to deactivate other contraceptive implants.

“The ability to turn the device on and off provides a certain convenience factor for those who are planning their family,” says MIT’s Dr. Robert Farra, adding that “the idea of using a thin membrane like an electric fuse was the most challenging and the most creative problem we had to solve.”

Bill Gates' New Population Control Microchip Due for Launch in 2018 | bill-gates-new-population-control-microchip-due-for-launch-2018-2217717 | Bill Gates Eugenics & Depopulation Medical & Health Multimedia RFID Chips Science & Technology Sleuth Journal But just as hackers can spoof wifi remotes to operate neighbors’ garage doors and flip their TV channels, could a remote-controlled contraceptive open the floodgates for a new form of ovarian hacking?“Someone across the room cannot reprogramme your implant,” says Farra.

“Communication with the implant has to occur at skin contact-level distance. Then we have secure encryption. That prevents someone from trying to interpret or intervene between the communications.”

The idea for micro-dispensing chips was first developed in the 1990s by Professor Robert Langer at MIT, the founder of innumerable biotech companies and holder of more than 800 patents, known in the industry as “the most cited engineer in history”. His lab caught the attention of Bill Gates in 2012, during his search for a revolution in birth control (which has already spawned plans for a graphene condom), and Langer subsequently leased the technology to Microchips, a company already working on a micro-dosing implant for osteoporosis.

Langer says that the implant will be available by 2018, once the coming trials are complete, and that the device will be “competitively priced” in a bid to ensure it replaces conventional contraception.

Bill Gates recently caused controversy after he spoke out about the immigration crisis in Europe saying that the continent will be “devastated by African refugees” unless severe and immediate action is taken to reduce the population in Africa.

This has left many questioning Gates’ motives behind his vaccination programs after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation had previously been accused of secretly sterilizing millions of women in Africa by doctors in Kenya after abortion drugs were discovered in Tetanus vaccines.

The program, which is funded by Bill Gates, has been accused of conducting a mass depopulation experiment on the people of Kenya without their consent.

Read more at: http://www.neonnettle.com/features/1046-bill-gates-new-population-control-microchip-due-for-launch-in-2018
© Neon Nettle


Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!


The post Bill Gates’ New Population Control Microchip Due for Launch in 2018 appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.


Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

A Prepper’s Guide to Respirator Masks

A Prepper’s Guide to Respirator Masks | Preppers-Guide-to-Respirator-Masks | Medical & Health PreparednessSurvival

A respirator mask is a prep that is potentially lifesaving, doesn’t cost a lot of money, and is oft-overlooked in the prepper world. Some folks like to invest in gas masks (which, of course, are irreplaceable during certain types of disasters) or they forget about respiration altogether.

The importance of something that can help you breathe without sucking harmful particles or vapors into your lungs cannot be overstated. After all, in the prepper’s adage of 3, air comes first:

3 minutes without air

3 days without water

3 weeks without food

I recommend keeping disposable masks on hand. They aren’t just for people whose budget is tight. Disposable masks can be used in many different scenarios in which a gas mask may not be practical.

It’s interesting to note that in China, the particulate levels due to pollution are so high that many people won’t leave their homes without donning a protective mask. (source)

Classifications of masks

A major question when purchasing respirator masks is which kind to get.

There are many different classifications, but today, we’ll discuss 3 popular types: the N, R, and P series masks.

The letter in the classification indicates the resistance of the mask to oil.

  • N – is not resistant to oil
  • R – is resistant to oil
  • P – is oil-proof

Then there are numbers, generally between 95 and 100. The number indicates the percentage of potential leakage.

  • 95 – filters out 95% of airborne particles
  • 99 – filters out 99% of airborne particles
  • 100 – filters out 99.97% of airborne particles

The type of filter you need depends on the type of threat you are facing. I don’t spend money on anything less than 100 series filters unless it is for something very minor, like working with sawdust.  These will screen out the smallest of particulates and because you never know what type of disaster you’ll be facing, it seems to me the best idea to filter out as much as possible.

If you’re only getting one kind, get the P100 type because this will be resistant to just about any threat. It comes in a reusable ($16.95 at the time of posting) and disposable ($8.21 apiece at the time of posting) version. If you get the reusable type, be sure to stock up on replacement filters.

10 Reasons Why Preppers Need Respirator Masks

There are many different situations in which a respirator mask could be handy – or even life-saving.

  1. Evacuating from a fire: Having lived in wildfire country for the past few years, my vehicle kit contains swim goggles and N100 masks for everyone. In the event of a fire, the goggles will protect our eyes from the smoke, and the respirator mask will help us breathe despite the ash and smoke. These would also be helpful bedside during a house fire.
  2. In the event of a nuclear strike: If a nuclear strike were to occur, as I’ve written before, it wouldn’t automatically be a death sentence if you are outside the initial blast zone. If you must travel to get away from the radioactive aftermath, wearing gear like a P100 mask, goggles, and a Tyvek suit will provide some protection from radiation.
  3. During a pandemic: If an airborne contagious illness is spreading, you can prevent inhaling the virus with an N100 or P100 mask. It all depends on the size of the virus (this information will generally be available from the CDC. Ebola, for example, is .02 microns, so the protection of a 100 series mask is essential.
  4. During search and rescue: After a building collapse, many dangerous particles will be floating through the air. A huge number of first responders and people working at the WTC on 9-11 ended up with multiple myeloma, a cancer of the blood. Thousands of people have fought off the cancer, only to have it reoccur repeatedly. (source) During search and rescue after any type of structural collapse, after an earthquake, for example, protect your lungs from the toxic debris floating through the air. An N-series mask will work in this situation.
  5. When performing work that involves particles: Protect your lungs with the appropriate masks if you are doing any type of work in which dust particles are prevalent. For concerns about sawdust, for example, an inexpensive N95 mask will suffice. If you’re cleaning up an area in which rats have been present, you’ll need to be concerned about hantavirus, and an N100 is in order. Particles from welding can be very small, also necessitating an N100 mask.
  6. When performing work that involves fumes: If you are spray painting or using strong chemical solvents, protect your lungs with a P100 mask.
  7. During a chemical attack…sort of: A P-100 mask may provide some protection during a chemical attack, but some weaponized gases will also absorb into your body through your skin. As well, unless you are expecting the attack and already wearing the mask when the chemical weapon was dispersed, it’s unlikely that you’d be able to get your protective gear on before the damage was done.
  8. During a riot: Of course, I always recommend avoiding large angry crowds, but if for some reason you’re in the midst of one, be prepared for the opposition to use a method like tear gas to disperse the crowd. Only a P-series mask will help in this situation.
  9. After a volcano: This seems like a far-fetched scenario, but with all of the recent seismic activity at Yellowstone, the possibility of a volcanic eruption isn’t totally out of the question. One of the biggest risks if you survive the eruption is breathing in the volcanic ash. An N-series mask will protect your lungs.
  10. Working in an area with mold: Mold spores can be a cause of severe chronic illness. If you’re working in an area in which mold is suspected, an N100 mask will protect you from the spores.

What are some good respirator masks?

If you are going to add respirator masks to your preparedness supplies, practice putting them on. If you are in a situation during which you need them, seconds may count and there won’t be time to be bumbling around.

Below, you can find links to some of the respirator masks that I recommend:

In most situations when you’ll need a mask, safety goggles will also be necessary. Get the kind with an elastic band around the back and rubber around your eyes to ensure a good, snug fit. In a pinch, you can use anti-fog swim goggles.

What protective respirator masks do you keep on hand?

Do you have any type of protective respirator devices? If so, what type do you use and why? Please share your knowledge in the comments section below.


Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!


The post A Prepper’s Guide to Respirator Masks appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.


Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

The Republicans In Congress Have Betrayed Us Again

The Republicans In Congress Have Betrayed Us Again | Obamacare-2.0 | Government Medical & Health Special Interests US Congress

I guess by now we should be accustomed to politicians lying to us. For years, Republicans have been promising to repeal Obamacare if we would just give them control of the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives. We did that, and now they are breaking that promise. Because even if “Obamacare 2.0” miraculously gets through the Senate, most of the essential elements of Obamacare will survive. If you look at the latest Senate bill, most of the Obamacare subsidies are still in there, many of the Obamacare taxes are still in there, and most of the Obamacare regulations are still in there. On top of everything else, the bill would create an absolutely massive health insurance company bailout superfund, and that is something that the Democrats never even dared to do. The bill being pushed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wouldn’t actually fix much of anything, and it certainly cannot be called a “repeal” of Obamacare.

I have said this before, and I will say it again. The Republicans got a bill to repeal Obamacare through Congress and on to Barack Obama’s desk in early 2016. Obama vetoed that bill, but now the Republicans should take that exact same bill and get it to Donald Trump’s desk.

Of course repealing Obamacare won’t fix our deeply broken health care system. But it would be a giant step in the right direction.

So why won’t the Republican do it?

Instead, they are trying to “fix” Obamacare, and that is about as futile as trying to “fix” a steaming pile of garbage.

In a recent editorial, Rand Paul explained why he cannot support this bill

The Senate Obamacare bill does not repeal Obamacare. Not even close.

In fact, the Senate GOP bill codifies and likely expands many aspects of Obamacare.

The Senate Obamacare-lite bill codifies a federal entitlement to insurance. With the Senate GOP bill, Republicans, for the first time, will signal that they favor a key aspect of Obamacare – federal taxpayer funding of private insurance purchases.

The bill will transfer billions of dollars to people who will then transfer billions of dollars to insurance companies. What a great business model – encourage the federal government to use taxpayer money to buy a private company’s product. Great business model, that is, if you are Big Insurance. Remarkable.

The Senate Obamacare-lite bill does what the Democrats forgot to do – appropriate billions for Obamacare’s cost-sharing reductions, aka subsidies. Really? Republicans are going to fund Obamacare subsidies that the Democrats forgot to fund?

Since it looked like the first version of the bill was destined to fail, Mitch McConnell released a new version of the bill today which includes even more government spending and interference

Seeking to quell a revolt from more than one-fifth of his conference, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell agreed to forego two significant tax cuts for the wealthy and instead pour hundreds of billions of dollars back into the proposal he released two weeks ago. There’s now $45 billion to combat opioid addiction and even more funding to help mitigate higher insurance costs for low-income people and to stabilize the individual markets. An additional $70 billion would go to states to to help drive down premiums, on top of $112 billion that was in the original proposal. McConnell’s target was senators toward the center of the Republican ranks, who represented the largest bloc of opposition to his first legislative draft.

This version is almost certainly destined to fail as well, because Rand Paul and Susan Collins have already come out against it, and McConnell can only afford to lose one more vote.

If a Republican bill cannot get through the Senate, McConnell is already talking about a bipartisan effort that would involve cooperation with the Democrats. And of course the Democrats will want to keep as much of Obamacare as they possibly can.

So at the end of the day it looks like we are going to end up with either “Obamacare”, “Obamacare 2.0” or “a new and improved version of Obamacare”.

Did we really spend all of that time, effort and energy getting Republicans elected for this?

Time after time these professional politicians use labels such as “Republican”, “conservative” and “Pro-Life” to get elected, but then once they get into office they betray our values over and over again.

When are we going to start electing real conservatives instead of placeholders? When the Democrats get power, they aggressively move their agenda forward, but when Republicans get power nothing too significant ever seems to change.

If I get the chance to go to Washington, I plan to be a wrecking ball. Party leaders like Mitch McConnell won’t like that very much, but if we can get enough good people elected in 2018 the Republicans will have entirely new leadership soon enough.

Health care is an issue that deeply affects all of us. So many middle class families have seen their health insurance premiums go up by hundreds of dollars a month, and that can be absolutely crippling for a family budget. At one point a health insurance company tried to double what I was paying per month, and so I can definitely relate to what so many others are going through.

We have got to dramatically lower health care costs. That means that we need substantial legal reform so that the cost of malpractice insurance goes way down, we need to remove as many “paper pushers” from the system as possible, and we need to restore as much competition to the system on every level as possible.

The health care system should be built around doctors and patients. There is way, way too much bureaucracy in the system right now, and lots of people that are never directly involved in providing health care are becoming exceedingly wealthy as a result.

Ronald Reagan once famously said that “government is the problem”, and this is another case where that phrase rings so true.

If you take the shackles off, the free market system actually works extremely well, but these days both parties seem to want to constantly drag us toward socialism.

If we do nothing, they will win, and that is why we need to stand up and fight for what we believe while we still can.


Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!


The post The Republicans In Congress Have Betrayed Us Again appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.


Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Is Plastic Surgery Going Organic?

Is Plastic Surgery Going Organic? | neck | General Health Medical & Health Organics Sleuth Journal Special Interests

The following article was written by my good friend, Dr. Richard DeAndrea, MD, ND. He’s the Medical Information Director at LifeSci Center and Medical Director at The Good Life. His work places him at the forefront of the exciting advances described.

Is it possible to get a breast augmentation without an implant? Is it possible to get a face-lift without a filler or Botox? Is it possible to get full lips? Is it possible to get a head of hair without a spray or surgery?

Yes, this is already happening, this is not a dream. Plastic surgery has gone organic. Over 250 breast augmentations have been performed in Japan without an artificial implant using the same person’s stem cells taken from fat after a slimming thigh liposuction.

The first face-lift free of filler or botox was performed on Sunset Blvd in Hollywood, by Dr. Richard Ellenbogen in 2010. In 2015, Lady Gaga revealed her secret way to natural lips, with full exposure in Cosmopolitan Magazine. CBS Channel 2 News Los Angeles reported about Dr. Ken Williams of the Orange County Hair Restoration Institute. He’s able to transform baldness to a full head of hair, as already has been done hundreds of times at The Hair Transplant Clinic of Rome, Italy.

What Is the Secret?

The secret is in you, your stem cells—not from embryos or another person. In a process known as Autologous Stem Cell Therapy, stem cells that come from your fat and are given back to you. Stem cells are a discovery that is turning the eye of doctors and surgeons to an organic approach, one that works with nature.

What Are Stem Cells?

Stem cells are unique cells found all over the body that regrow and replace the skin, hair, and fat content that changes in our bodies from day-to-day. In fact, millions of cells die on our skin in one day, these cells must be replaced or we would simply degenerate and disappear into the ethers.

How Are Stem Cells Affecting Plastic Surgery?

Stem cells are replacing silicon and saline implants and can be combined with fat from the abdomen, thighs and buttocks after liposuction to fill the breast like a balloon, up to two cup sizes. Women have gone from an A cup to a C cup and retained this size even after dieting. The same cells can be injected under the skin and into muscles to cause a face-lift and regenerate fine lines without a single drug or resection of skin.

Stem cells can be injected into a petri dish with hair samples to cause more hair to grow that may be transplanted into the scalp by micro-needle injection, causing your own hair to regrow.

Stem cells can stimulate growth of other stem cells in the lips. Even stem cells from plants have been shown to catalyze or stimulate the growth of stem cells in the lips, potentially giving lips a younger, fuller appearance.

The plastic enhanced days of Joan Rivers and Michael Jackson are losing traction. Plastic surgery is going organic because a new era has dawned in which the power of nature is replacing the false perception of better living through chemistry. It is time to get real and look good doing it, for beauty is and always has been deep within every cell of our being.

Time to go organic!


Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!


The post Is Plastic Surgery Going Organic? appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.


Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Miraculous Vaccines: Here They Come Again

Miraculous Vaccines: Here They Come Again | microneedle-patch-vaccination | General Health Medical & Health Science & Technology Sleuth Journal Special Interests Vaccines

image: www.cdc.gov]

(The Real Agenda News) It is said to be as “efficient” as a traditional vaccine, but without the pinch and the pain.

How about the side effects?

I have written at length about the falsehoods pushed by the pharmaceutical industry and how these fraudulent “truths” become pillars to justify massive vaccination campaigns that never prevented, treated or cured any disease.

It is true; not all vaccines kill you, at least not immediately, but all vaccines do slowly kill you over time.

Despite clear evidence that vaccines never had any significant effect in preventing, treating or curing disease, there is a strong echo for new vaccines that will miraculously cure cancer or other difficult to treat medical complications.

A US scientific team has created a micro needle patch to replace the traditional syringe needle when it comes to getting a shot. That somehow has been dubbed as a revolutionary advancement of science.

It is a band-aid with a hundred needles, as thin as a hair, on the adhesive side that penetrate the surface of the skin.

The invention has successfully passed the first clinical trials of the flu vaccine, the results of which have been published in the British medical journal The Lancet, the same publication that hosts climate alarmism so-called anthropogenic global warming studies.

The patch pierces the upper layers of the epidermis, while regular injection of the flu reaches the muscle.

Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, who are responsible for the study, believe the invention could help boost immunization of the population, including children and other patients who fear needles.

Note that the invention is not highlighted for its safety, for example, but for its convenience. That is because most patients and most doctors still believe that vaccines are safe, even though they are not.

“The patch offers the same protection as a traditional but painless vaccine. You have to apply it on the wrist and make enough pressure to make sure the microneedles will penetrate the skin.

After 20 minutes, the patch is removed. At that time, the micro needles will have dissolved between the skin, along with the vaccine,” said Dr. Nadine Rouphael, one of the leaders of the research.

Rouphael argues that the improvement over traditional methods is that patches are simple enough for anyone to apply to themselves and do not need to be stored cold – they are stable at 40 ° C for a year.

“It does not generate acute waste, which allows people to get vaccinated at home. It could be an advantage for pandemic flu where mass vaccination is necessary,” he says. Dr. Rouphel does not mention that some of the most dangerous pandemics were caused precisely by vaccines themselves.

A hundred people between the ages of 18 and 49, who had not been vaccinated against the flu in the previous season, participated in the tests.

They were divided into four groups: one received a placebo patch, another the traditional injection vaccine, another had the patch applied by a medical team and in the latter, the patches were applied by the participants themselves.

The antibody level with the drug components in 28 days a supposed measure of immunogenicity of the vaccine (falsehood) was the same across all vaccination methods and did not have serious side effects, although some people experienced redness, itching and tenderness in the area of the skin where it had been applied.

More than 70% of the participants stated that in the future they would prefer this method to injection. See, people! Convenience. Not safety.

The creators of the patch, whose patent belongs to the biopharmaceutical Micron Biomedical and must be authorized for widespread use within five years, work on the development of versions for measles, rubella and polio. In reality disease such as polio have made a comeback thanks to the use of vaccines.

Last year the United States already approved a flu shot with a micro needle that also promises to eliminate the pain, and Australian scientists created a nano patch with needles even smaller than those of this flu vaccine.

“The preliminary results of these new routes of administration are quite good, the protective response is the same, and that opens the door to improving the coverage of the population,” said Amos García Rojas, president of the Spanish Association of Vaccines.

The traditional vaccine requires a special transport to keep it cold, in addition to that it can only be administered in medical spaces, which increases the cost and affects its availability.

For this reason, Garcia points out that the new method may be especially interesting for developing countries.

It is precisely in developing countries where this experimental product and others are first deployed under the excuse of advancing medical health in poor countries and it is exactly there where more people die from the same diseases that vaccines are supposed to prevent.


Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!


The post Miraculous Vaccines: Here They Come Again appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.


Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

The Silent Vaccine Epidemic: Experts Explain Why Vaccines Are Not Life Savers (VIDEO)

The Silent Vaccine Epidemic: Experts Explain Why Vaccines Are Not Life Savers (VIDEO) | Documentary-The-Untold-Story-of-Vaccines | Medical & Health Multimedia Sleuth Journal Special Interests Vaccines

(The Real Agenda) Aluminum, insect repellent, formaldehyde, mercury, fetal tissue, and in some cases attenuated or live viruses are some of the ingredients present in vaccines today, yet, we are told they are the reason why humanity’s overall health and well-being has improved dramatically.

Traditional medicine cooked up by pharmaceutical companies dictates that vaccines are life savers, but there is a growing movement in the medical field that includes doctors and nurses -supported by scientists and evidence- who not only warn about the potential risks on vaccines, but also about its lack of effectiveness..

The conclusion reached by this group of concerned professionals is simple: There isn’t strong evidence to support the claim that vaccines are capable of doing what the medical industry says they do. That is why governments at the local, regional and national levels, supported by alleged international health agencies are tightening the grip on vaccination policies, making vaccines mandatory, even though there is no law that mandates vaccinations.

Despite the heavy use of vaccines since a child is born, it is not difficult to learn about the efficacy of vaccines -or the lack of it- because doctors, nurses and parents have had a front row seat to witnessing the appearance of the unhealthiest population of children in the history of humanity.

Parallel to the appearance of diseases that were thought to be extinct such as asthma, diabetes, arthritis, cancer, chicken pox, eczema and many others, health issues that were supposedly treated and eradicated with vaccines are also reappearing despite so-called medical advances in the 20th and 21st centuries.

Vaccine pushers like to blame those who decide not to vaccinate themselves and their children as the culprits of the reappearance of disease, but in truth, that which is to blame is unscientific postulates, such as herd immunity, the bedrock over which mass vaccination has been supported on for ages.

While parents and doctors who ask questions about the effectiveness of vaccines are ostracized, label as heretics and often verbally and physically abused by the system, children continue to get sick after being injected cocktails of chemicals known as vaccines. Many of these children remain damaged for life, while others die as a result of side effects.

It is impossible not to be suspicious about vaccines and pharmaceutical companies regarding the safety and effectiveness of their products. One of the aspects that makes people question these products is the fact that vaccine makers legally exempted from lawsuits regarding potential damage that result from vaccines.

Another point that many people raise is the existence of a special vaccine court created by the medical industry and government agencies, where people damaged by vaccines take their cases, as supposed to a traditional court. Then, there is the fact that should a vaccine manufacturer be found liable for the negative medical consequences of their vaccines, it is the government, not the vaccine maker that compensates people for vaccine side effects.

Tens of millions of dollars have been granted to parentes and children whose lives were damaged by vaccines. Of course, this fact is kept as quiet as possible by the mainstream media, as they receive billions of dollars in advertising money from the pharmacetical industry every year.

These and other issues about vaccines are addressed in the documentary produced by Gary Null, titled “Silent Epidemic; The Untold Story of Vaccines“, in which medical experts, not journalists or ‘kooks’ explain why vaccines are one of the biggest hoaxes in history.

We encourage everyone to watch the documentary below and critically analyze the arguments posed by these experts before making a decision on whether it is necessary to vaccinate and if they can trust their health to vaccine makers.


Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!


The post The Silent Vaccine Epidemic: Experts Explain Why Vaccines Are Not Life Savers (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.


Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Five Tick-Borne Diseases That All Americans Should Be Aware Of

Five Tick-Borne Diseases That All Americans Should Be Aware Of | tick | General Health Medical & Health Special Interests

By: Joshua Krause, Ready Nutrition

Not too long ago, most people weren’t aware of Lyme disease. The scientific community didn’t even know that it was carried by ticks until the 1980’s, and it took many more years before the disease became common knowledge among the public. But that’s not the case anymore. These days, pretty much everyone knows about it, and it’s widely reported on by the media every year before and during tick season.

While that, of course, is a good thing, it’s gotten to the point where people automatically think of Lyme disease when they hear about ticks. But they probably can’t list any other tick-borne diseases, or what their symptoms are. That’s unfortunate, because there so many kinds of diseases that are carried by ticks, and you should be aware of them all. The some of the most common that are found in North America include the following:

  1. Powassan Virus is often difficult to diagnose, and very few labs can test for it. Symptoms usually emerge between 1-3 weeks after being exposed, and initial symptoms include a headache, nausea, confusion, and fever. As conditions worsen, symptoms include seizures, impaired movement, and aphasia, which causes victims to lose the ability to comprehend language. 10% of people who are infected with Powassan die and 50% suffer from permanent mental effects.
  2. Colorado Tick Fever is typically found in the mountainous regions of the Western United States and Canada. Symptoms, which include light sensitivity, nausea, rash, fever, muscle pain, headaches, as well as swelling of the liver and spleen, often emerge within a week of exposure. After that, they often disappear before reemerging for a period of 1-3 days. This cycle of illness can go on for weeks, and increase in severity each time until the victim recovers.
  3. Tick-borne Relapsing Fever is similar to Colorado Tick Fever, in that symptoms can emerge and disappear several times before the victim recovers. Symptoms usually show up between five and fifteen days after being bitten, and include rashes, fever, chills, headaches, and muscle pain, and can go on for weeks if the disease is not treated.
  4. Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever is one of the most lethal tick-borne illnesses in the United States, and people throughout North America can be infected with it. It takes one to two weeks for symptoms to emerge, which include a headache, vomiting, fever, muscle pain, loss of appetite, and inflammation in the salivary glands. Later symptoms include pink eye, joint pain, and confusion, as well as pink spotty rashes throughout the body.
  5. Tularemia, also known as Rabbit Fever, has symptoms that typically show up within three to five days of exposure, and include fever, loss of appetite, and whole body weakness. Most notably, it can lead to sepsis and organ failure. For people who seek treatment, the survival rate is 99% but drops to 93% when not treated.

Fortunately, these diseases have many symptoms in common, like fever, lethargy and muscle pain, nausea, and headaches. It’s safe to say that if you fall ill in the days or weeks following a tick bite, don’t assume it’s something innocuous like the flu. Seek medical treatment as soon as possible.


Joshua Krause was born and raised in the Bay Area. He is a writer and researcher focused on principles of self-sufficiency and liberty at Ready Nutrition. You can follow Joshua’s work at our Facebook page or on his personal Twitter.

Joshua’s website is Strange Danger


Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!


The post Five Tick-Borne Diseases That All Americans Should Be Aware Of appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.


Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

New Innovation In Telomere Extension

New Innovation In Telomere Extension | New-Innovation-In-Telomere-Extension | General Health Medical & Health Science & Technology Special Interests

Telomeres are the caps at the end of human DNA strands known as chromosomes that protect the DNA code of the genome. As humans age, telomeres begin to decrease in size, causing cellular aging. After telomeres reach a certain length, the cell is no longer able to divide and will die. This process has been associated with disease, aging, and death. Antioxidants are often credited as providing nutritional support that can help protect normal telomere size and function.

Telomere Extension: Is It Possible?

Studies have shown that a healthy lifestyle and stress reduction can have a huge impact on telomeres, causing them to grow longer, potentially even lengthening lifespan. Researchers at Stanford University School of Medicine have recently uncovered a new procedure for quickly increasing the length of telomeres in the laboratory. [1]

Scientists discovered that cells treated with this type of procedure acted as though they were much younger than untreated cells. Cells that had their telomeres lengthened by the treatment multiplied up to 40 times more quickly than untreated cells. By increasing the number of times cells are able to divide, the procedure essentially turns back the aging clock in cultured cells.

While the procedure causes telomeres to lengthen initially, the effect is only temporary. After 48 hours, telomeres resume shortening regularly as cells divide. The temporary nature of this new technique is key to the procedure’s potential for success, since infinitely dividing cells could create a risk of cancer if used in humans.

The discovery offers numerous potential benefits for humans, paving the path to treating and preventing aging diseases and other conditions associated with shortening telomeres. By developing telomere extension therapies, scientists can improve existing cell therapies and possibly treat aging conditions, such as heart disease and diabetes, or target types of muscle cells in cases of muscular dystrophy. The procedure may also increase the amount of cells available for research and studies like disease modeling and drug testing.

Ways You Can Protect Telomeres

Currently, researchers are testing the procedure on different cell types. By working to understand and overcome the differences among cell types, scientists hope they can make the procedure more universally useful. Things that you can do to protect telomeres from shortening prematurely include eating a diet rich in antioxidants, reducing stress, exercising, increasing vitamin D production, and improving the quality of your sleep. Some research has also shown that tea drinkers have longer telomeres than non-tea drinkers. [2]

What are your anti-aging protocols? We’d love to hear about your suggestions and opinions in the comments!

References:

  1. Ramunas J, Yakubov E, Brady JJ, et al. Transient delivery of modified mRNA encoding TERT rapidly extends telomeres in human cells. FASEB J. 2015 Jan 22. pii: fj.14-259531.
  2. Sheng R, Gu ZL, Xie ML. Epigallocatechin gallate, the major component of polyphenols in green tea, inhibits telomere attrition mediated cariomyocyte apoptosis in cardiac hypertrophy. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 20;162(3):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.07.083.


Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!


The post New Innovation In Telomere Extension appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.


Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

The Real Danger Behind MRIs

The Real Danger Behind MRIs | mri-fb | General Health Medical & Health Special Interests

Magnetic resonance imaging is a common preventative and diagnostic method used in medicine, and at times this technology can be invaluable. Of course there are some health questions associated with the practice, such as does the practice involve powerful magnetic fields? But for those who require them in case of an emergency, they can be extremely helpful. Besides the minute threat of magnetic frequencies, new concerns over the drugs used to produce clearer images have been shown to leave toxic residue in the brain. These findings have shown the importance of more stringent health monitoring prior to MRI application.

The Real Danger Behind MRIs

MRIs are typically safer than a CT scan, as they emit little to no radiation during the procedure. The real concern surrounding MRIs, in fact, has nothing to do with the technology at all. Patients are often given injectable drugs that improve the visibility of certain areas in the brain, which can be very useful for discovering health issues that could possibly be missed. [1] The issue is that these drugs may accumulate gadolinium–a toxic metal–in brain tissue.

The medications, known as contrasting agents, sharpens the resulting images; however, it may also be contributing to deleterious effects, many of which have yet to surface in any research. Toxic metals that build up in brain tissue are commonly associated with age-related brain declines, such as those attributed to dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. [2] Some research even shows that these drugs could be linked to kidney problems, prompting FDA to issue a “black box” warning on the drugs.

What You Should Know about MRIs

There are currently nine gadolinium-based agents in the United States, and two of the most concerning are made by GE Healthcare and Bayer HealthCare. Omniscan is perhaps the most commonly-used contrast agents used during MRIs, as is Magnevist, Gadavist, and Dotarem. If you take into consideration the compounds we are exposed to almost every day that are already contributing to brain degeneration (i.e., aluminum), you can see why you must be constantly aware of what is being offered to you by medical professionals. Ask questions and research any drugs that you are being given, especially if you are having an MRI, and work with your doctor to find safer methods for obtaining your health goals.

References:

  1. Jeff Gerth. Left in the Brain: Potentially Toxic Residue from MRI Drugs. Pro Publica. Journalism in the Public Interest.
  2. Squitti R. Metals in Alzheimer’s disease: a systemic perspective. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012 Jan 1;17:451-72.

 

The post The Real Danger Behind MRIs appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.


Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

A 21-Year-Old Man Has A Baby, And Doctors Say ‘Womb Transplants For Men’ Will Soon Be Possible

A 21-Year-Old Man Has A Baby, And Doctors Say ‘Womb Transplants For Men’ Will Soon Be Possible | Pregnant-Public-Domain | Medical & Health Science & Technology Sleuth Journal Special Interests

Do you think that men should be having babies? Years ago I remember being told that someday we would see these sorts of headlines, but such a thing seemed so impossible to me at the time. Well, now it is actually happening. Over in the UK, a 21-year-old British man named Hayden Cross has just given birth to a baby girl. But of course Hayden was not actually born a man. Hayden used to be known as “Paige Cross”, but eventually a decision was made to embrace a transgender lifestyle. However, Hayden put his transition on hold in order to become pregnant and give birth.

Now that the birthing experience is over, Hayden plans to “complete his gender realignment as soon as possible”. The following comes from a major British news source

Hayden, born Paige, gave birth by caesarean.

He put his transition on hold to fall pregnant by a sperm donor.

Cradling his daughter the beaming parent said: “She’s perfect in every way.”

And he told The Sun: “She is so good. I’m so lucky.”

Following the birth Hayden now plans to return to complete his gender realignment as soon as possible.

The proud father was born a girl, Paige, 21 years ago.

The reason why this story is getting so much attention is because this is something entirely new, but if doctors have their way men all over the world may soon be getting pregnant.

That is because fertility researchers are “working on womb transplant procedures” that would theoretically allow any man to have a baby

Fertility doctors in the U.K. are reportedly working on womb transplant procedures that would allow transgender people born as males, and also other men, to have babies.

Moreover, National Health Service doctors told The Mail on Sunday that taxpayers should fund such transplants, citing “equality enshrined in law.”

Dr. Amel Alghrani of Liverpool University said that such a transplant procedure is a real possibility, and explained that it could help not only transgender women have children, but also gay and straight men who “wanted to experience the joys of carrying a child.”

So if a man had a “womb transplant” and still wanted to be known as a man, what would be the proper way to identify such a person?

As I discussed just recently, “gender fluidity” is becoming a major trend in our society, and the lines between “male” and “female” are increasingly being blurred. In fact, fashion designers are now putting out dresses, skirts and 8 inch heels for men.

At this point, even the U.S. military is having to deal with these issues. An Obama-era policy that would have forced the military to accept transgender service members has been delayed by the Trump administration until January 1, 2018, and there are many that are trying to get that deadline pushed back indefinitely

According to Liberty Counsel, the “Obama-era policy would have allowed incoming service members identifying as ‘trangender’ to enlist if they have been ‘stable’ in their gender identity for 18 months.”

The organization explained: “Such a policy is wide-reaching, applying to use of barracks, bathrooms, shower rooms, and coerced ‘training’ of military and civilian personnel. The Obama policy directly undermines unit readiness as well as religious and conscience objections.

“Then, of course, there are the practical implications – like biological men showering next to women, ‘male pregnancies,’ and off-duty drag,” FRC explained.

Previous generations of Americans never had to face these issues, and our world is changing at a pace that is almost incomprehensible.

Eventually, we could see the day come when most pregnancies are actually created in laboratory settings. Stanford University professor Hank Greely believes that this would give couples the opportunity to choose embryos that have not inherited any diseases

Within three decades people will no longer be having sex to procreate, a professor from Stanford University has said.

Hank Greely, the director of Stanford’s Law School’s Center for Law and the Biosciences, believes the reproductive process will begin with parents choosing from a range of embryos created in a lab with their DNA.

Although this can already take place, Mr Greely believes it will become far cheaper to do so and couples will opt for this method to prevent diseases.

If you are familiar with my work, then you already know how I feel about this sort of thing. Creating a bunch of embryos to select the “best one” and killing the rest is unspeakably evil.

But this is where our society is going. Technology is advancing at an exponential rate at the same time when we are in an accelerating state of moral decline. It is quite frightening to think about where this path will eventually lead us as a society.

Today, we literally have the ability to create human-animal chimeras and other “monsters” in our labs, but we lack the moral foundation to understand that this is deeply, deeply wrong.

Just because we can do something does not mean that we should. In so many ways technology has made all of our lives a lot better, but it can also open up doors to great darkness.

One of the reasons why western societies thrived over the centuries is because there was always respect for certain moral boundaries. But now that respect is rapidly disappearing all over the western world, and that has chilling implications for our future.

Moral laws are just as real as scientific laws, and when we willingly ignore them we do so at our own peril.


Subscribe to The Sleuth Journal Newsletter for Daily Articles!


The post A 21-Year-Old Man Has A Baby, And Doctors Say ‘Womb Transplants For Men’ Will Soon Be Possible appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.


Source: Alternative news journal

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS